• Comment

Local man tries to get "none of the above" on mayoral ticket

Hoping to give Lubbock voters another choice for mayor, Philip Howard picked up an application for the city office for the option to choose "none of the above."

Posted: January 31, 2012 - 8:16pm  |  Updated: February 1, 2012 - 2:39am
Send me an email
FOLLOW TOMMY MAGELSSEN
Follow Tommy on Facebook
Follow Tommy Magelssen on Twitter
Check out my latest blog post

Hoping to give Lubbock voters another choice for mayor, Philip Howard picked up an application for the city office recently.

However, he didn’t intend to run for office.

Rather, he said, he wanted to put the phrase “none of the above” as a candidate on the ballot.

“If someone is running unopposed, then they automatically win,” Howard said. “Usually the only protest vote is to not vote at all or for a third party.”

Howard ran into a roadblock in the form of the city charter, though, when he was told all candidates filing for city office must meet the charter’s requirements.

Since “none of the above” is not a person, Howard could not proceed.

The city has a process of checking names given on an application, said City Secretary Becky Garza.

The city will check an applicant’s given name with its date of birth with the voter registration number to make sure there are no phony names, Garza said.

However, if someone’s legal name was something out of the ordinary, like None of the Above, Garza said she would put it on the ballot — not before checking with city attorneys and the Texas Secretary of State’s Office, though.

“If he’s registered to vote that way, and that is his legal name, then we would put that on the ballot,” she said. “I don’t think we would disqualify someone because of that.”

Howard said he will probably not change his name to None of the Above, and he still plans to vote for the office.

There is a spot on the application for the exact name appearing on the ballot. This can include common nicknames, Garza said.

There is language on the application affirming any nickname “does not constitute a slogan nor does it indicate a political, economic, social, or religious view or affirmation.”

Additionally, the application states a candidate must have been commonly known by the nickname for at least three years prior to the election.

Garza said she would review with attorneys and the Secretary of State’s Office if there was a nickname that could invoke voter bias or confusion.

In 2006, Texas gubernatorial candidate Carole Keeton Strayhorn tried to have her nickname listed as “Grandma” on the official ballot, but Secretary of State Roger Williams denied the request, stating the nickname was part of a slogan.

To comment on this story:

thomas.magelssen@lubbockonline.com • 766-8723

leesha.faulkner@lubbockonline.com • 766-8706

  • Comment
1
Rating: 1 (1 vote)

Comments (3)

Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.
0
0

There you go Phillip! I think

There you go Phillip! I think a lot of citizens would rather vote for none of the above over the ra-tards we've had running the last 4 elections.

0
0

Federal

Can we get none of the above as an option for the presidential and congressional elections this year?

0
0

The answer to the question....

The answer to the question "running4district2" avatar makes is NO. George Bush and republican policies did. From the day Obama took office ( 750,000 jobs lost that month alone) the jobless rate has been in an upward trend untill we are at last in positive growth territory. That's just a fact.

The near collapse of the finacial industry ( and maybe our whole economy) happened under Bush. T.A.R.P. was a republican bailout let's not forget.

So again the answer to the avatars query is an emphatical "HELL NO"

Back to Top