• Comment

Williams: Raiders have to cash in

Tech needs 7s, not 3s, in big games

Posted: October 7, 2012 - 10:55pm  |  Updated: October 8, 2012 - 12:15am

Texas Tech wasn’t going to beat Oklahoma on Saturday the way Landry Jones was playing. Not with the Sooners’ quarterback throwing on time, in rhythm, without having to wait for a receiver to come open.

Tech safety D.J. Johnson said Jones panics when a defense takes his first option away. That might or might not be true, but the Red Raiders never much tested the theory.

With Jones efficiently throwing for 259 yards and two touchdowns, it was easy to say “no pass rush,” but when a quarterback with an NFL arm takes three steps and throws on target — last year, he missed some open receivers — then there’s not much time for a rush to materialize. In that instance, Jones is hard to beat.

But the Red Raiders could have done a better job making a game of it, and that’s the point here. Tech’s 41-20 loss to Oklahoma was similar to the Red Raiders’ 52-20 loss last year at Texas, to the extent they didn’t make the most of their opportunities. In that one, Tech got to the Texas’ 12- and 22-yard lines and kicked field goals, got to the UT 43 and turned it over on downs, got to the 39 and punted.

On Saturday, Tech advanced to the OU 18 and 26 and kicked field goals, reached midfield and threw an interception, made it to the OU 36 and turned it over on downs.

Heck, the Red Raiders even scored a touchdown in the final seconds of both games, obscuring the fact they put up only 13 points when the outcomes were in doubt.

Even after the Red Raiders closed to 14-13 at 6:58 before halftime Saturday, Tech coach Tommy Tuberville didn’t like the feel of it.

“I thought the situation where we had to kick that second field goal really took the life out of us,” he said. “We can’t get in the red zone and kick field goals every time and they’re getting in the red zone and scoring touchdowns. Against good teams, you’re not going to beat them very often.”

Ability isn’t necessarily the issue, because Tech had 411 yards that afternoon in Austin and 360 yards — only 20 fewer than the Sooners — on Saturday. There’s the theory that spread offenses struggle in the red zone, but Tech can run the ball. That’s supposed to make the Red Raiders harder to defend and less predictable inside the 20.

On Tech’s first drive, center Deveric Gallington and guard Le’Raven Clark made an enormous hole that Kenny Williams ran through untouched for a 7-yard touchdown.

That was the last drive the Red Raiders finished with authority until the one at the very end of the game. Williams turned an ankle and had only two carries after the second series. That hurt.

A week ago at Iowa State, in the aftermath of a 24-13 Tech win, it was easy to overlook how the Red Raiders on three separate series had negative plays in first-and-goal situations: a sack, a run for minus yardage and a holding penalty.

The Red Raiders’ problems down deep continued Saturday. Tech turned a first-and-10 from the OU 24 into third-and-12 with a run for lost yards and an incomplete pass. A little later, the Raiders turned second-and-3 from the OU 26 into another field goal after an incomplete pass and a penalty.

If the Red Raiders prioritize anything this week, red-zone offense would be a good place to start.

West Virginia comes in Saturday, and putting up 3s is no way to beat the Mountaineers.

To comment on this story:

don.williams@lubbockonline.com • 766-8734

george.watson@lubbockonline.com • 766-2166

  • Comment
Comments (6) Add comment
ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Posts and comments do not reflect the views of this site. Posts and comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Flag as offensive" link below the comment.

Learning experience

Saturday is going to be a big learning experience. With no pass rush we will probably give up 70+. Their defense has been scored on (Baylor) so lets see how the offense has improved. We need to settle on a starting receiving corps. Maybe that will help.

What has happened to Dennard #88 (WR) and Starts (DL).



Starts have blood pressure issues & i dont know what is wrong with Kennard but he played Saturday


red river

What is going to upset most folks will be clear during OU UT game. UT will stomp OU this year.

By the end of the day it will be clear that WVU, K State and UT are better than OU, and possibly OSU too, at least in Stillwater.

Iowa State used the wrong QB until this past Saturday v. TCU, so lucky we got them early. And TCU may not regroup before we play them, so perhaps some more good fortune there.

Otherwise, mediocrity lives here. Two more wins and then another off season and cupcake period of the same BS. And some, provided stadium capacity paid for, are Jerry Jones-like just fine with those results.

How many students x $10,000 does Rick Perry need in Lubbock, a "higher ed reform" that A&M and UT have rejected! His "let's be a corporation" buddy Hance is right there with him, soon to remove even more heart and soul from Tech. Thank goodness my profs were not "monetized" as Perry and Hance envision or else I would be a widget sheeple, and goodness knows we are not going anywhere with dinosaur good ole boy butt kissers who like Perry and Hance types.



Why are you an a Tech website? You have no interest in the school. You sound like a 20 yr old liberal who is angry at someone but doesn't know who or why.

As to football, it is a game and Tech competes at a very high level. Nothing to be ashamed of. I think we'll do fine this year if we keep our enthusiasm up.



I'm glad Williams is finally seeing the light. Up until now, it was as if he thought Tubs walked on water. It really makes you wonder about Tub's decision making when he himself admits that kicking that second field goal took the life out of the team and that he says that kicking field goals against good teams will not allow you to win. Then why would he do it? It showed a complete loss of confidence in both the offense and defense. Once again, he is washed up and needs to go.


WR corps

I agree with Thrash. I have said it on other posts on this website already. We need to settle on 5 or 6 guys at WR. This offense needs rhythm, timing and chemistry. Most of the prolific offenses out there have their main tandem and two or three other guys that help make plays. We need to settle on those 2 go to guys and those other 3 or 4 Wide-outs. Seth needs to develop timing and trust with those 5, or the offense will continue to struggle! The O-line didn't help by not giving him enough time, but the WR's need enough experience to recognize when they are going to need to help their QB out. Let's go Tech beat WVU!!!

Back to Top